A Proactive Approach to Preventing the Flu ~ Building Health (Part One)

images vaccine

images vaccine

Our current health is the cumulative result of the choices we have made in the past. Our future health will be the result of the choices we are making today.It’s all about choices.

Unfortunately, it’s challenging to make an “educated” choice when it comes to this H1N1 flu vaccine issue because it requires having accurate, logical and truthful information at your disposal in order to make an accurate and educated decision. That’s not easy to come by.

Fear is running rampant. So are exaggerations and untruths, as well as irresponsible reporting.

I continue to encourage you to think through your options VERY carefully when it comes to this vaccine… looking far beyond what has ever-so-conveniently been placed under your nose. Do some digging. Demand more.

BUT, the bottom line is this: regardless of what you decide to do regarding the H1N1 vaccine (or the seasonal flu vaccine), if you want to stay healthy, you MUST take action. You’ve got to create health on your own. Vaccines can’t do that for you. (No, they can’t. Remember, health means consistent homeostatic cell function. Vaccines and drugs can’t do that. Yes, they will change your physiology. That’s not what we’re talking about, though.)

You must make healthy choices in order to be healthy. Vaccine or not.

You cannot make the dangerous assumption that if you get the vaccination, you’re good to go. Absolutely not. Please do not make that mistake. Also, you cannot make the assumption that doing ‘nothing’ will keep you healthy. Health is PROactive – it requires your intentional effort. It requires you to meet your innate genetic requirements when it comes to nutrition, movement and mindset.

All right. No more arguing about this. That’s a waste of energy and it creates stress. Let’s get proactive!

I’ve seen some great advice and tips to keep you healthy this season. That’s the purpose of this article – I want to help you to shift your focus from fear of the flu and from trying to avoid it, to an empowering and confidence-building approach of BUILDING health.

I’ve heard countless practicing physicians say that the people in their clinics who are experiencing the most severe flu-like consequences are the ones who had an underlying health challenge in the first place. So, why don’t we make it our objective to drastically improve our underlying health?!

Build health. It’s common sense.

If you “build health” you improve your chances of not getting the flu in the first place AND, if you do end up with the flu, you improve your chances of handling it just fine… as our immune systems were created to do in the first place.

Here are some of my personal favorite tips for building health, as well as specifically preventing any common illness this “flu season”:

1)      Quit stressing out!! Seriously. Unchecked stress causes the release of stress hormones in our bodies which then sends us reeling into the physiological stress response and a whole host of health challenges.

The more you allow negative stress to get the best of you, the more vulnerable you become to ALL illness. Unfortunately, if you buy into any of the news we’re all hearing from mainstream media regarding the swine flu, you’re probably stressed to the gills! Fear is a big part of this “pandemic”. This is quickly becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy for many.

I’m telling you plain and simple – KNOCK IT OFF! Stress WILL make you sick. Evidence-based science shows us that you’ve clearly got more to be concerned about with the effects of chronic stress than with H1N1.

You cannot avoid all stress. Nor do you need to. You CAN change the way you respond to it. You can also minimize your exposure to it. I believe it’s your responsibility to do so, if health is a priority. Stress and hype and fear will always be there. You can choose NOT to engage.

Honestly, I believe this is THE most important health-protecting step you can take right now. Quit thinking like everyone else is thinking. Turn off the news for awhile. Relax. Get enough rest. Be thankful and appreciative. Find the positives in your life. Laugh. Smile. Pray. Meditate. Breathe. Connect. Choose happiness. It’s for your health!

2)      Get enough vitamin D. From everything I’ve researched, the ideal source for Vitamin D is actually threefold: (i) unfiltered, regular exposure to the sun, (ii) a healthy, balanced diet full of real, whole foods including vitamin D rich foods, and (iii) a high quality Vitamin D-3 supplement.

There’s a reason we have a “cold and flu season” in the first place. In many places, this is the time of year when we simply don’t get the same ultra-violet exposure and therefore don’t produce as much Vitamin D on our own. Optimal function of every system in our bodies – including our immune systems – depends on getting sufficient amounts of Vitamin D.

Some great food sources of Vitamin D are cod-liver oil; grass-fed whole fat butterfat and dairy products (preferably raw); fatty fish, such as wild salmon; seafood, particularly shrimp and crab; liver and organ meats; and whole eggs.

That being said, it’s difficult to get sufficient amounts of Vitamin D from our food alone, particularly if you choose “low-fat” or “fat-free” options for dairy. You’re missing a critical opportunity to provide your body and brain with the essential fat soluble fat soluble vitamins that are hard to come by in other foods.

According to Dr. Mercola’s website (which draws from leading natural health experts worldwide, not just Dr. Mercola), “If you are coming down with flu like symptoms and have not been on Vitamin D, you can take doses of 50,000 units a day for three days to treat the acute infection. Some researchers believe the dose could even be as high as 1,000 units per pound of body weight for three days.”

A tad different than conventional advice of “400 iu per day”, isn’t it?!

In addition to eating many of the Vitamin D rich foods regularly, and eating an overall healthy diet, I currently take 12,000 iu of Vitamin D-3 per day on average – some days more, some days less. I’m also taking a very high quality brand. I wouldn’t high dose like this if it were a low-grade, toxic brand. Stay away from Vitamin D -2… if it doesn’t say that it’s D-3, it’s most likely D-2.

3)      I just alluded to it in the earlier sentence. Eat a healthy diet! Remember to center the majority of your meals and snacks on the Circle of Health: protein, healthy fats & oils, vegetables, fruit and pure water.

Then, apply the 4 Golden Rules of Nutrition: 1) eat real food (not man-made chemistry experiments) 2) eat whole foods and foods in their closest to naturally occurring state 3) eat the least toxic foods you can find 4) eat fresh, seasonal foods, often raw.

Essentially, eat a variety of healthy things. Most people tell me, “I probably need to eat more vegetables.” What are you waiting for? Eat more vegetables!

Also, clean up as much as you can when it comes to the animal products you consume. Toxins bioaccumulate in the tissues of animal products more so than in produce. So, choose less-toxic dairy, meats (poultry and fish included) and eggs. Look for organic, free-range, grass-fed, nitrate-free, antibiotic-free, hormone-free, and wild (vs. farm-raised) when you’re making your choices. It’s common sense. The more toxic your food – the more toxic YOU.

4)      Avoid sugar like the plague! Sugar drastically impairs the function of your immune system… and quickly. This is not only important for this particular season, but also for the protection against and prevention of ALL chronic illness.

There are some obvious ways to cut back on sugar intake. The biggest culprits are things like pop, fruity drinks, sweets and junk food. But there are also some not-so-obvious sources that contain massive amounts of sugar or convert to sugar very quickly: juice, juice drinks, sports drinks, alcohol, designer coffee drinks and so on.

By the way, sugar substitutes in the form of artificial sweeteners don’t fare much better. Toxic on many levels.

Another enormous culprit is processed, refined GRAINS! Things like cereal, breads, pasta, pastries, crackers, chips, pretzels and many common ‘snack foods’. These all convert to sugar very quickly and sabotage our efforts to create a healthy immune system. In fact, if you’re loading up on vitamins in an effort to boost your immune system, but you’re still eating a lot of grains, you’re sabotaging your efforts.

We’d be wise to get rid of most of these conventional grains in our diets. If we’re not going to eliminate them, then better choices are the ones we can upgrade – like choosing whole grains, sprouted grains, and organic grains. Not perfect, but definitely less damaging to our health.

I’m going to temporarily stop here. I’ve got a few more common sense, easy-to-implement tips to keep you strong and healthy this season… but let’s begin with these. I’ll post the rest later today.

Related Blogs

“Just One Thing” ~ Simple Steps for Better Health ~ Simple Flu Prevention/Immune Boosting Strategy

sugar

sugar

Remember, these “Just One Thing” simple tips are meant to encourage you in your journey to better health. Each one is something relatively *easy* to accomplish… doesn’t take a complete life make over to fit it into your already-busy lifestyle.

You’ve probably ‘heard’ me say a hundred times, “Getting healthier isn’t about being perfect… it’s about making better choices, more often.” HealthIER doesn’t have to be harder.

Today, the focus is on something you may be overlooking in your attempt to prevent the flu (or colds) this year. I hear many people talking about what to add – whether it’s high doses of vitamin D-3 (a great thing), fish oil, garlic, echinacea, olive leaf extract, or even the vaccine (not that I’ve seen a lick of scientific evidence that it is effective or safe… the topic of several other articles here!) – but I’m not hearing too much about the things we’re ingesting that are sabotaging our efforts.

One of the biggest immune system offenders out there is sugar. Not the biggest news to most of you!

In a simplified nutshell, sugar competes for the same cell receptors that powerful antioxidants need in order to maximize the function of your immune system. You can visualize that when you consume sugar, it’s blocking the pathways for the “good stuff” you’re putting in your body to do its job.

Ok, so that’s part one. If you truly want to protect yourself this “flu season”, get rid of all that sugar. Avoid high fructose corn syrup like the plague.

Part two might be a little more enlightening.

The sugar we’re ingesting isn’t just coming from candy bars, junk food, juice and soft drinks… although those are certainly obvious places to begin cleaning up your diet. The massive amounts of sugar we ingest also come from refined, processed GRAINS like cereal, bread, pasta, pastries, crackers, granola bars and so on. The North American diet is FULL of these foods that convert very quickly to sugar.

Many experts would tell us that we don’t need these grain-y foods in our diet at all. That’s tough for many of us. A great plan for transition is: 1) decrease your intake of grains, and 2) upgrade your choices of grains – choose whole grains/sprouted/organic, etc. This offsets some of the negative consequences of eating grains.

What DO we need in our diets? “Clean” (non-toxic), whole protein, fats & oils, veggies, fruit and water.  Every day.

Another sugar culprit is alcohol. I’m not one to lecture on this subject. Just be aware that alcohol diminishes the function of your immune system because of its sugar content. Fruity drinks tend to be the worst. You can google your favorite adult beverage to see where it stands.

By the way, all those artificial sweeteners are just as bad… if not far worse.

OK, it may sound like a lot, but basically here’s what today’s tip is in order to boost your immune system and avoid the flu, when it comes to sugar:

1) avoid sugar from the obvious things like pop, juice drinks, sports drinks, candy, junk food, and so on.

2) limit your intake of grains and upgrade what you do consume.

3) limit your intake of alcohol, and know the sugar content of what you’re drinking.

4) don’t assume conventional sugar substitutes, low-sugar, sugar-free foods are any better.

Eat real foods – whole foods – in their closest to naturally occurring state – as non-toxic as possible – as fresh as possible – often raw.

Related Blogs

An Expert’s Opinion of the H1N1/Fear Pandemic

I want to share this article recently written by Dr. James L. Chestnut of Victoria, British Columbia.

I like logic, science, truth and common sense. Dr. Chestnut consistently cuts through the heaping mounds of pseudo-science that is so prevalent, and presents a clear, scientific perspective.

Here’s what he has to say.

October 30, 2009

The H1N1 Issue: Flu Pandemic, Fear Pandemic, or Both?

James L. Chestnut B.Ed., M.Sc., D.C., C.C.W.P.

The H1N1 issue has become so prevalent that I thought it appropriate to share some factual perspective. I realize that factual perspective is neither newsworthy nor popular when people are in the midst of a mob mentality of fear but I’m willing to risk unpopularity in order to encourage people to be guided by science, reason, and logic.

As you’ve heard me say so many times the key to finding the truth is asking the right questions. If we don’t ask the right questions we will never get the right answers. Irrational fear usually comes from asking the wrong questions or failing to ask the right ones. As I often point out it is not what we don’t know that poses the greatest danger, it is what we think we know that is false. We also must be aware of confounding factors creating self fulfilling prophecies. Sometimes fear is rational, sometimes it is not. Regardless, the most important thing is to ACCURATELY assess the threat and then identify an evidence-based, logical, reasonable, and RATIONAL response or course of action.

Let’s start with the H1N1 flu virus itself. Clearly this flu virus is a reality and clearly it can lead to illness. The most important question is what kind of illness. The FACT is that the type of illness associated with this virus in over 99.9% of CASES is mild to moderate flu symptoms which include fever, nausea which can include vomiting, and of course general malaise. Not very pleasant to be sure but is this any different than the symptoms associated with the flu viruses that have been the source of the seasonal flu for the past 50 years? No. Although not every seasonal flu virus is associated with vomiting the truth is that vomiting is not considered serious. Seriously uncomfortable – yes, seriously risky in terms of death or severe complications – no.

But what about the deaths from H1N1? We all must admit and understand that even the thought of a child dying is enough to send any parent into hysterics. I can’t think of anything more frightening. So let me be clear. I am not suggesting that the threat of harm or death to my child or any child is not something to fear. What I am suggesting is that we RATIONALLY assess the threat and then assess our fear level to see if it is appropriate. Good decisions, decisions that minimize threat and maximize safety, are NOT based on irrational fear. Fear is our worst enemy. Logical interpretation of available facts is our best ally.

Here is what we need to know before we can make a decision about an appropriate fear level associated with risk of death from H1N1. First we need to know how many deaths have been caused by H1N1 in any given population. The next question to ask is whether or not those who have died had underlying illnesses that made them more susceptible or more at risk. In other words we need to know how many of the deaths ASSOCIATED with H1N1 are actually CAUSED by H1N1.

To assess the absolute risk of dying from H1N1 we need to divide the number of deaths in any given population by the number of people in that given population. In Canada as of Oct 17, 2009 there had been a total of 1,604 hospitalizations, and 83 deaths associated with H1N1. By the way by this time H1N1 was already being portrayed as a DEADLY PANDEMIC. So, out of a population of approximately 35 MILLION there were 83 deaths. This means your chance of dying of H1N1 up to this point was 83/35,000,000 which is one in 421,687. This means the chance of death from H1N1 was 0.0002%.

To date these risks are similar in the United States and throughout the rest of the world.

It is not easy to get exact numbers on the number of deaths that are caused by underlying conditions or secondary bacterial infections but estimates are that these would represent at least 99% of all deaths associated with H1N1. So, if you do not have an underlying illness your chance of dying from H1N1 is 1% of 0.0002%. Not exactly worthy of widespread panic.

The chances of dying in a car accident, airplane accident, a fall, from complications of air pollution, from complications from industrial toxins or from medical treatment are EXPONENTIALLY GREATER. What is the difference? The media and the health authorities are not focusing your attention on these risks. You have more chance of dying in a car accident on your way to get an H1N1 vaccine than dying from H1N1. Statistically it could be concluded that it is an undue risk to get into a car and get the vaccine! I could not find any published peer-reviewed data to determine whether the H1N1 vaccine is safe or effective. In other words there is no available information that would be required for any other medical intervention that the H1N1 vaccine works or if it is safe. This does not mean it is not safe or effective, it just means we have no data which would be considered scientifically valid to utilize to form our opinions. Even if we assume the vaccine is safe and effective, statistically there is still more risk of death from the car ride to get the vaccine than from dying from H1N1!

So what is going on in my opinion? Well I think some very well intentioned people are allowing fear rather than science and data to guide public policy. I’m not alone in this opinion by the way. Have a read of the following quotes from a recent article published in The British Medical Journal entitled “Calibrated response to emerging infections” http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/339/sep03_2/b3471. In fact read this entire article, I think it offers a very good perspective and it is very well referenced.

Pay particular attention to how the health authorities have changed the definition of a flu pandemic!

“Since the emergence of novel A/H1N1, descriptions of pandemic flu (both its causes and its effect) have changed to such a degree that the difference between seasonal flu and pandemic flu is now unclear. WHO, for example, for years defined pandemics as outbreaks causing “enormous numbers of deaths and illness,” but in early May, removed this phrase from the definition.”

Changing views of pandemic flu, before and after emergence of influenza A/H1N1 virus:

Aspect Before A/H1N1 Since A/H1N1
One line summary WHO 2003-9: “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness” WHO: “An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity”
Virus and immunity WHO 2005:”Most people will have no immunity to the pandemic virus” WHO: “The vulnerability of a population to a pandemic virus is related in part to the level of pre-existing immunity to the virus”
US CDC 1997: “When antigenic shift occurs, the population does not have antibody protection against the virus” US CDC: “Cross-reactive antibody [to A/H1N1] was detected in 6%-9% of those aged 18-64 years and in 33% of those aged >60 years”
Impact (health, social, economic) WHO 2005: “Large numbers of deaths will occur . . . WHO has used a relatively conservative estimate – from 2 million to 7.4 million deaths . . .
Economic and social disruption will be great”
WHO: “H5N1 has conditioned the public to equate an influenza pandemic with very severe disease and high mortality. Such a disease pattern is by no means inevitable during a pandemic. On the contrary, it is exceptional”
CDC 1997: “The hallmark of pandemic influenza is excess mortality” CDC: “There are some pandemics that look very much like a bad flu season”
Canada 2006: “An influenza pandemic results if many people around the world become ill and die from such a [new form of influenza] virus” Canada: “An influenza pandemic does not necessarily cause more severe illness than seasonal influenza”

“But the 2009 pandemic, taken as a whole, bears little resemblance to the forecasted pandemic. Pandemic A/H1N1 virus is not a new subtype but the same subtype as seasonal A/H1N1 that has been circulating since 1977.”

“Furthermore, a substantial portion of the population may have immunity. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that 33% of those aged over 60 had cross reactive antibody to novel A/H1N1,which may explain why cases have been rare in elderly people.” Interestingly a recent report by CBC in Canada indicated that 4 preliminary studies showed that the chance of having immunity to H1N1 is DECREASED if you have regularly been vaccinated for seasonal flu. It will be interesting to see if they pursue this any further and publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal.

“On 26 April, with 20 cases and no deaths in the US, the Department of Health and Human Services declared a nationwide public health emergency.

“The SARS outbreak showed that large numbers of infected people are not necessary to generate concern and fear over disease. The SARS virus is known to have affected only 8096 people globally, but the fear of infection, involuntary quarantine, travel restrictions and subsequent political antagonisms, and at least $18bn in losses were felt by far more. It was not the virus but the response to it that caused these social and economic harms.”

So what is my conclusion; is the H1N1 issue a flu pandemic, a fear pandemic, or both?

My conclusion is that at this point it is a pandemic of fear and NOT a flu pandemic. Of course it depends on how you define pandemic! The data available make it clear that we are experiencing an H1N1 seasonal flu BUT that to date this is not associated with significant risk of death or serious illness.

The FACT is that the current level of alarm and fear are NOT supported by data. However, this could change. What we cannot say is that things will not get worse. There is sufficient data to date to strongly suggest that it won’t but data can only accurately tell us what has happened not what will happen. Certainly the odds are that H1N1 will pass with the same overblown fear and unactuated threat as SARS. Only time and data with tell.

I do have some concerns about the fact that testing for H1N1 has now been virtually all but discontinued. The authorities are now assuming that any case of the flu is H1N1. This means we will NEVER have any valid data about incidence, prevalence, or death rates. All such assessments without actual confirmation of infection are, in scientific terms, invalid. The term they will use is speculative. Sounds better than saying we are guessing.

Another concern is that deaths associated with H1N1, as with all previous seasonal flu viruses, are vastly overestimated. The annual published death rates for flu are NOT from confirmed deaths due to flu and in fact even CDC published stats reveal that most deaths “associated” with the flu are actually not from the flu at all but almost entirely from pneumonia. Less than one percent of deaths reported as associated with seasonal flu are actually caused by seasonal flu and even in these deaths the vast majority occur in people with underlying conditions.

Another concern is that it is unlikely that we will ever get any data on whether or not those who have been vaccinated have been protected. If one actually reads the primary research studies (not the news or published summaries by health ministries) on the seasonal flu vaccine what one finds is that the data does not support claims that the regular seasonal flu vaccine significantly decreases the incidence of flu or complications from it. Recently there has been some admission that the vaccines do not prevent the flu and that indeed they only guess correct on which virus to vaccinate against less than 30% of the time. However the health authorities still justify recommending the vaccine by claiming it decreases the severity of flu and complications from it. All I am asking for is to have DATA guide policy not DOGMA.

One of the sources of controversy is that vaccine benefits are often reported as relative risk reductions not absolute risk reductions so when one applies the results in real life one quickly realizes that the actual reduction of risk for those vaccinated vs not vaccinated is not statistically significant. They often report that the flu vaccine reduces hospitalizations or deaths but they report the relative difference between vaccinated vs unvaccinated not the absolute difference. In other words there might be 5000 people in each study group and there may be 4 deaths amongst those unvaccinated and 2 deaths among those vaccinated. This relative difference is reported as a “50% reduction in deaths in those vaccinated vs not vaccinated”. Of course what this really means is that if you are vaccinated, and you get the flu, you have a 2 in 5000 chance of death. If you are unvaccinated and you get the flu you have a 4 in 5000 chance of death. An absolute difference of 2 in 5000 – not even remotely significant and certainly not worthy of the national vaccination campaigns and the billions of dollars spent on the vaccines. YES, they do report things this way!!

Some good references on this topic are Jackson et al., Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in seniors, International Journal of Epidemiology 2006; 35: 337-344 and Jefferson, T. Influenza vaccination: policy versus evidence. British Medical Journal 2006; 333: 912-915 and Jefferson et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in elderly people: a systematic review. Lancet 2005; 366: 1165-74 and Simonsen et al. Mortality benefits of influenza vaccination in elderly people: an ongoing controversy. Lancet Infectious Disease 2007; 7: xxx-xx.

But doesn’t it seem like we have more flu and more associated deaths this year?

Yes is does SEEM that way. However the truth is that although the flu seems to have come early this year it has not come with any greater incidence or seriousness – at least not yet. The real story is that although death rates are not significantly higher than most years there have been some deaths among children and this is just so tragic that it causes great fear and anxiety. HOWEVER, the risk to otherwise healthy children of dying from H1N1 is FAR less than the risk of dying in a car accident. This does not minimize the importance of these tragic losses, it just puts them in perspective in terms of absolute risk.

But aren’t more kids away from school and adults away from work this year?

Yes, absolutely. However the frenzy of fear this year has changed things significantly and skewed them toward a self fulfilling prophecy. This year if anyone has even a sniffle they are kept home because we have all been told that we are in the midst of a deadly pandemic and that it is our moral obligation to stay home. In past years we have always gone to work with the flu because for the most part we can work through it. We can’t logically use the number of people away from school or work as an accurate indicator of the severity of this year’s flu pandemic. We have to use the data about illness rates, severity, and death rates. When we use this data to form our opinions and policies our fear level will certainly move away from hysteria.

What is ironic is that the health authorities have started vaccinating those people who have been identified as most susceptible to serious complications. They have also stated that we should avoid close contact in order to avoid spread. Now we have those identified as being most susceptible congregating in close contact waiting for the vaccine! Remember these people also had to put themselves at GREAT risk (relative to risk of death from H1N1) by traveling on the road to get to the vaccination site. Obviously the minute risk of death from a car accident is not a rational reason to avoid driving to get the vaccine if you think this is a good strategy. This is a valid use of risk analysis to help you put your fears about death from H1N1 into perspective. Fear and anxiety cause the release of stress hormones that down-regulate your immune system!

So what should we do; what is a scientific, logical and reasonable strategy?

  1. Be rational, put things in proper perspective and ask the right questions.
  2. Be scientific and logical. Get the facts and apply them to your strategy.
  3. Don’t panic if you or a loved one gets the flu. Keep hydrated, stay home, eat intelligently and REST. If severe complications arise go to your medical doctor or a walk-in clinic.
  4. Be preventative. Eating well, exercising, and staying relaxed (Eat Well Move Well Think Well™) are evidence-based ways to optimize your immune defenses, to minimize risk of both becoming ill and of complications, and to maximize your recovery should you become ill.
  5. Take Vitamin D – this is absolutely one of the most evidence-based interventions available for reducing incidence and severity of seasonal cold and flu. The data is very very strong. See the upcoming Vitamin D newsletter from Innate Choice www.innatechoice.com for more information and for references.


Related Blogs

More on the Swine Flu Vaccine…

My earlier article, “H1N1 ~Should You Get the Flu Vaccine?” has ruffled a few feathers. I’m not exactly surprised.

It was written from a personal viewpoint – not meant to be a purely scientific report. I can send you to the right places to read your scientific data. I simply wanted to share my thought process with you.

Unfortunately, some folks out there who are dead-set on mass vaccination took this as an open window to attack my “unscientific pseudoscience” and dissemination of “misinformation”.

I, of course, find this highly amusing since that’s exactly what I think of the fear-mongering tactics, lack of evidence and questionable accuracy in reporting and advising, generated by mainstream health authorities. Widespread opinions and ‘health’ advice are being based on statistics which are highly inaccurate and poorly reported.

I’m talking about the federal governing bodies’ extrapolation of data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The CDC says one thing – the figures and recommendations we’re hearing from the mainstream clearly do not match up.

Makes me ask all those silly questions again!

By the way, was I, or was I not perfectly clear that this is YOUR choice. You will have to do what you feel comfortable with. Do what you trust. I just encourage you to research BEYOND that which is being placed under your nose for you to conveniently find… and to hopefully convince you to look no further. Please, look further.

Once you do, if you still decide to get the vaccine, super. You will have made an educated choice. That’s nobody’s business but YOURS.

One thing I had personally questioned in that article is how “new” the vaccine is and how we can’t possibly understand long-term consequences as a result.

That was attacked by someone in the medical field saying “it’s not new”.

Hmm… really? How long ago does a vaccine have to be created in order to be considered “old” and trusted. (I just laughed really loud in my head… using all those words in the same sentence!)

Here’s an article from the end of May 2009 stating that companies were STARTING to work on the H1N1 vaccine. Tell me if I’m wrong – isn’t that about FIVE MONTHS ago?! Now, for some of you little renegades out there, that may be plenty long enough to assure you that a drug is “safe” (there goes that laughing in my head again!)… I’ll pass on this rookie concoction. Don’t you dare come near my children with something obviously still in experimental stages.

http://www.reuters.com/article/middleeastCrisis/idUSN28367585

And I’M the one misinforming?

Actually, I’m sharing. You can choose to listen or not. But please don’t argue the silly little things like when the CDC reports to us that a new vaccine is in the making. C’mon!

Also, in case there was any confusion from my earlier statements, I do NOT believe that if you develop the flu it’s because you ate junk food and thought unhappy thoughts. Seriously?

I DO believe that many people will develop the flu this year – some H1N1, some not. I pray for them. I certainly don’t sit on a high horse of Wellness Lifestyle and say, “If you had only listened to me and eaten more broccoli, done more sit-ups and smiled more…” I can’t tell you how insulting that is.

Then again, it didn’t come from a regular reader of mine. Those of you who follow me know me better than that and understand the significance of consistently choosing non-toxic and adequate amounts  of genetically required movement, nutrition and a healthy mindset.

I’m going to address some other arguments that I’ve been hearing… but, just like my rule for nutritional toxins in this household, “only one at a time”. I need to take a break between commenting on these attacks… since I’m not a big fan of being personally attacked. The additional stress of having to defend myself, on top of researching and sharing, can become a negative thing pretty quickly. I don’t want that to happen.

I’ll be back with more… soon!

Related Blogs

Swine Flu Update

images needle

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/27/Obama-Declares-Swine-Flu-Emergency.aspx

Here’s an excellent resource for current, accurate information regarding H1N1.

Also, make sure you bookmark this site for ongoing updates: www.swineflu.mercola.com

Did you know that since August 30th, 2009 the CDC has not been tracking H1N1 virus activity? (Yet, a National Public Health Emergency has recently been declared!)

Nowhere on the CDC site do they mention 1,000 confirmed deaths due to H1N1… like we’ve been hearing from government officials.

As of August, NO serological confirmation is required for classification of influenza-like symptoms (!)… instead, clinical parameters have been suggested.

What does that mean? Is your doctor a psychic or does he/she have x-ray vision? Hope so, ‘cuz that’s pretty much what it’s going to take to determine if you have “regular” flu or H1N1… or something completely different. NO BLOOD CONFIRMATION IS REQUIRED.

Of those whose clinical parameters matching those of H1N1 (according to the CDC), after being properly tested, only 2% actually HAD H1N1!! That means, statistically speaking, 98% of people being diagnosed with H1N1 don’t actually have it.

If the CDC changes what they’re saying and/or doing, or the numbers on their site are wrong and they get corrected, I WILL CORRECT THE INFORMATION HERE.

Related Blogs

H1N1 ~ Should You Get the Flu Vaccine?

I’m finally going to start writing about this topic, first, because SO many of you keep asking me to! Second, because the powers-that-be have pushed me too far by declaring this a national emergency. It’s more than my already-full brain can take.

I’ll tell you what’s a national emergency – the number of people who die day after day from “properly”  prescribed pharmaceutical drugs and “properly” administered allopathic procedures. That’s a real crime AND a pandemic.

What else? How about the rates of chronic illness, like cancer, diabetes, obesity, arthritis, heart disease, depression, anxiety disorders, learning disorders, infertility, reproductive and digestive disorders, Alzheimer’s… and on and on… these chronic illnesses are skyrocketing year after year. THAT’S a national emergency.

Science continues to clearly demonstrate that these are largely the result of our environment – nutrition, movement, mindset, response to stress – yet, those aforementioned powers that be continue to let it go. Instead, we dump more money into things that can’t POSSIBLY build our health. We are NOT getting sick – whether it’s the flu or cancer – because we are deficient in vaccines and drugs.

Anyhow, back to the issue of “Swine Flu”.

Should you get vaccinated? Guess what? It’s not my call.
You need to make that decision for yourself and your family. You need to understand that there are two VERY different sides to this story. Both come with heated opinions. It’s an emotional subject.

People will die every year from some strain of the flu. (Far more will die from pharmaceuticals, conventional allopathic procedures and chronic illness, mind you.) Is this enough of a reason to justify the risk of a completely new vaccine? Your call.

The people who die from the flu are not healthy. Sounds redundant, doesn’t it? Read it again.

Healthy people don’t die from the flu. In order to die from the flu, you have to be leading a toxic and deficient lifestyle already – in your nutrition, your movement and your mindset. You have to consistently fail to meet your body’s genetic requirements for health. You have to be placing yourself in and creating an environment that is toxic and stressful… and not do anything about it for a very long time.

If you’re leading that type of lifestyle, will adding a flu vaccine to your “intake” suddenly protect you? Gosh, that sure would be nice if vaccines actually worked that way. I might just be first in line to shoot up!

I can’t tell you what to do – just like you can’t tell me to vaccinate my children. Like any enormous life decision, you need to carefully weigh your odds. You need to understand the consequences of both possible actions you take. Have you researched enough?

The trouble is, “science” can so easily be presented in a way that suits the opinions and motives of the presenter. Sadly, it means next-to-nothing to me when I hear someone in the media quote a “scientific study”. I find myself wondering Who paid for the study and how the results have been distorted in order to present the desired version of the story.  Common sense, and perhaps an ongoing distrust in a system that generally concerns itself more with profits than health, urges me to ask simple questions.

Questions like, where’s the proof that the vaccine actually works? How could we really know that it does? The swine flu is still so new and the vaccine is even newer. Can you compare someone who (reportedly) dies from swine flu to the same person, vaccinated, to see if it could have been prevented? Of course not. So how can we say that certain deaths could have been prevented? It’s ignorant to say so.

How are we really testing and classifying what’s swine flu and what’s not? Does it really matter? Either way, that individual is not functioning at optimal levels of health and that’s where the problem is.

Explain to me again how injecting known toxins into my bloodstream is going to protect me and not cause me harm in any way? And, just for fun, once again tell me how clearly we understand all the trillions of possible cellular reactions and responses that could take place in each and every individual that gets injected… you know, the stuff like, how will this vaccine react with our entire cellular history of nutrition, stress, other drugs, tobacco, alcohol, environmental toxicity, and so on?

We still don’t even know the answer to that little issue in the case of a “simple” aspirin.

Trust me, I could go on and on in my oh-so simplistic way of wondering about the common sense things. My point is, there’s no possible way “science” can explain all of these things… especially when that science has a big financial stake in the whole deal.

In MY case, no, I’m not getting the vaccine. Don’t come near my children with it, either. You’ll meet Mother Bear pretty quick. I simply won’t allow anyone to play Russian Roulette with my future or that of my children. (I’m fully aware that some will use this exact same statement as their reason to GET vaccinated!) I’ve yet to see evidence of safety and efficacy of this vaccine. I’ve yet to see that creating better health and taking better care of yourself  isn’t the most effective approach by far. I trust myself and the tools for optimal health that I came equipped with FAR more than a vaccine or drug. I know what it takes to create health and avoid illness. (Whether I consistently do it or not is a choice.)

I will NOT tell you what to do regarding the vaccine other than think very carefully about it. It’s a personal choice. A choice every family makes for themselves.

For starters, I recommend looking at the other side of the story presented by people and organizations like Dr. Sherri Tenpenny (www.DrTenpenny.com), National Vaccine Information Center (www.nvic.org), Dr. Joseph Mercola (www.mercola.com), Mary Tocco (www.marytocco.com), Natural News (www.NaturalNews.com),  www.MomVaccines.org and www.Brainguard.com.  There are many more resources out there. Take your pick.

Then, in an upcoming article, I’ll focus on the REAL situation – how to get HEALTHY! If we get and stay healthy then we don’t get sucked into all the emotional drama and hype of a “national emergency”.

Arm yourself with better information in order to make an educated decision, then arm yourself with the right tools and support to do something about it.

Ultimately, I think the bottom line is this. If you want to stay healthy and avoid the flu – with or without the vaccine – you’ve got to make healthy choices. Your health is the result of your environment. I can help you understand the simple healthy lifestyle choices that will propel you to greater health.

If you choose to get the vaccine, I urge you to take these healthy choices even more seriously. Your body will need additional help overcoming the toxicity of the vaccine.

Healthy people make healthy choices.

Related Blogs

How Can I Make Sure I’m Getting Enough Vitamin D?

Making some Vitamin D!
Making some Vitamin D!

Making some Vitamin D!

With the infamous “cold & flu season” right around the corner, as well as all the hype about the swine flu, many people are wondering what they can do to stay healthy and decrease their risks for developing this flu.

While I never believe there is only “one thing” when it comes to a successful ‘treatment’, or only “one thing” when it comes to the underlying cause of an ailment, Vitamin D does consistently make the list of things-to-do in order to achieve better health and prevent illness.

Currently, it’s being hailed as the major player in preventing the swine flu.

Yes, having sufficient levels of vitamin D will absolutely help us improve our health AND help us avoid illness… BUT, not at the expense of an otherwise unhealthy lifestyle.

The REAL ‘magic’ happens when we’re consistently focused on making pure and sufficient choices in our overall nutrition, exercise and mindset, while we simultaneously reduce or eliminate toxic and deficient choices in those areas of lifestyle.

We can’t eat a toxic diet, while leading a sedentary, stressed out, negative life and think that adding some vitamin D (or any other vitamin, or drug, or vaccine) is going to fix everything!

Health and sickness are determined by the lifestyle choices we make.

That being said, here’s a little article I recently wrote about vitamin D. Check it out, and pass it along to someone who’s trying to achieve better health!

http://articlesmind.com/?id=18952

Enjoy!

Related Blogs

Stay Informed and Know Your Rights ~ Swine Flu Vaccination

Here’s a great video to keep you informed and aware of your choices.

National Vaccine Information Center Public Awareness Video

Related Blogs

The Swine Flu Pandemic – Fact or Fiction

I’ve been asked by many in our practice to comment on this swine flu scare. I’ve made plenty of “comments” (hard to believe, I know!), but hesitated in writing a full-blown article mainly because it would not seem believable to most. The history, statistics and background research are so overwhelming that it seems unbelievable in the midst of all the craziness we’re hearing in the news.
Then, Dr. Mercola, with his extensive team of researchers, just published this fantastic report on the subject. Working on my own, I couldn’t have quickly put all the research together for you like “Team Mercola”… so I wanted to share this report with you as soon as possible. They’ve painted the entire picture for you – it would have taken me another week! There’s far too much fear-mongering going on right now for you to have to wait another week!
Please note at the end of his article that we share a very strong belief: the way to avoid developing ANY illness is to CREATE HEALTH through moving well, eating well and thinking well. The specifics of our recommendations may vary slightly (for example, I still recommend high-quality fish oil over krill oil for now, until more convincing research exists), but the message is the same: sickness doesn’t like to live in a healthy person!
Here’s Dr. Mercola’s article:
Critical Alert: The Swine Flu Pandemic – Fact or Fiction?

By Dr. Mercola

American health officials declared a public health emergency as cases of swine flu were confirmed in the U.S. Health officials across the world fear this could be the leading edge of a global pandemic emerging from Mexico, where seven people are confirmed dead as a result of the new virus.

On Monday April 27th, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised its pandemic alert level to four on its six-level threat scale,1 which means they’ve determined that the virus is capable of human-to-human transmission. The initial outbreaks across North America reveal an infection already travelling at higher velocity than did the last official pandemic strain, the 1968 Hong Kong flu.

swine fluThe number of fatalities, and suspected and confirmed cases across the world change depending on the source, so your best bet — if you want the latest numbers — is to use Google Maps’ Swine Flu Tracker.

Several nations have imposed travel bans, or made plans to quarantine air travelers2 that present symptoms of the swine flu, such as:

  • Fever of more than 100
  • Coughing
  • Runny nose and/or sore throat
  • Joint aches
  • Severe headache
  • Vomiting and/or diarrhea
  • Lethargy
  • Lack of appetite

Top global flu experts are trying to predict how dangerous the new swine flu strain will be, as it became clear that they had little information about Mexico’s outbreak. It is as yet unclear how many cases occurred in the month or so before the outbreak was detected. It’s also unknown whether the virus was mutating to be more lethal, or less.

Much Fear Mongering Being Promoted

I suspect you have likely been alarmed by the media’s coverage of the swine flu scare. It has a noticeable subplot – preparing you for draconian measures to combat a future pandemic as well as forcing you to accept the idea of mandatory vaccinations.

On April 27 Time magazine published an article which discusses how dozens died and hundreds were injured from vaccines as a result of the 1976 swine flu fiasco, when the Ford administration attempted to use the infection of soldiers at Fort Dix as a pretext for a mass vaccination of the entire country.

Despite acknowledging that the 1976 farce was an example of “how not to handle a flu outbreak,” the article still introduces the notion that officials “may soon have to consider whether to institute draconian measures to combat the disease.”

WHO and CDC Pandemic Preparedness Seriously Broken

The pandemic warning system has failed as it simply doesn’t exist, even in North America and Europe. To improve the system massive new investments in surveillance, scientific and regulatory infrastructure, basic public health, and global access to common sense interventions like vitamin D optimization are required.

According to the Washington Post, the CDC did not learn about the outbreak until six days after Mexico had begun to impose emergency measures. There should be no excuses. The paradox of this swine flu panic is that, while totally unexpected, it was accurately predicted. Six years ago, Science dedicated a major story to evidence that “after years of stability, the North American swine flu virus has jumped onto an evolutionary fasttrack”.

However, maybe this is precisely what public health authorities desire.

This is NOT the First Swine Flu Panic

My guess is that you can expect to see a lot of panic over this issue in the near future.  But the key is to remain calm — this isn’t the first time the public has been warned about swine flu. The last time was in 1976, right before I entered medical school and I remember it very clearly. It resulted in the massive swine flu vaccine campaign.

Do you happen to recall the result of this massive campaign?

Within a few months, claims totaling $1.3 billion had been filed by victims who had suffered paralysis from the vaccine. The vaccine was also blamed for 25 deaths.

However, several hundred people developed crippling Guillain-Barré Syndrome after they were injected with the swine flu vaccine. Even healthy 20-year-olds ended up as paraplegics.

And the swine flu pandemic itself? It never materialized.

More People Died From the Swine Flu Vaccine than Swine Flu!

It is very difficult to forecast a pandemic, and a rash response can be extremely damaging.

As of Monday April 27, the worldwide total number of confirmed cases was 82, according to WHO, which included 40 cases in the U.S., confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control.  But does that truly warrant the feverish news headlines?

To put things into perspective, malaria kills 3,000 people EVERY DAY, and it’s considered “a health problem”…  But of course, there are no fancy vaccines for malaria that can rake in billions of dollars in a short amount of time.

One Australian news source,3 for example, states that even a mild swine flu epidemic could lead to the deaths of 1.4 million people and would reduce economic growth by nearly $5 trillion dollars.

Give me a break, if this doesn’t sound like the outlandish cries of the pandemic bird-flu I don’t know what does. Do you remember when President Bush said two million Americans would die as a result of the bird flu?

In 2005, in 2006, 2007, and again in 2008, those fears were exposed as little more than a cruel hoax, designed to instill fear, and line the pocketbooks of various individuals and industry. I became so convinced by the evidence AGAINST the possibility of a bird flu pandemic that I wrote a New York Times bestselling book, The Bird Flu Hoax, all about the massive fraud involved with the epidemic that never happened..

swine fluWhat is the Swine Flu?

Regular swine flu is a contagious respiratory disease, caused by a type-A influenza virus that affects pigs. The current strain, A(H1N1),  is a new variation of an H1N1 virus — which causes seasonal flu outbreaks in humans — that also contains genetic material of bird and pig versions of the flu.

Interestingly enough, this version has never before been seen in neither human nor animal, which I will discuss a bit later.

This does sound bad. But not so fast. There are a few reasons to not rush to conclusions that this is the deadly pandemic we’ve been told would occur in the near future (as if anyone could predict it without having some sort of inside knowledge).

Why a True Bird- or Swine Flu Pandemic is HIGHLY Unlikely

While in my opinion it is highly likely factory farming is responsible for producing this viral strain, I believe there is still no cause for concern.

You may not know this, but all H1N1 flu’s are descendants of the 1918 pandemic strain. The reason why the flu shot may or may not work, however, from year to year, is due to mutations. Therefore, there’s no vaccine available for this current hybrid flu strain, and naturally, this is feeding the fear that millions of people will die before a vaccine can be made.

However, let me remind you of one very important fact here.

Just a couple of months ago, scientists concluded that the 1918 flu pandemic that killed between 50-100 million people worldwide in a matter of 18 months — which all these worst case scenarios are built upon — was NOT due to the flu itself!4

Instead, they discovered the real culprit was strep infections.

People with influenza often get what is known as a “superinfection” with a bacterial agent. In 1918 it appears to have been Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Since strep is much easier to treat than the flu using modern medicine, a new pandemic would likely be much less dire than it was in the early 20th century, the researchers concluded.

Others, such as evolutionary biologist Paul Ewald,5 claim that a pandemic of this sort simply cannot happen, because in order for it to occur, the world has to change. Not the virus itself, but the world.

In a previous interview for Esquire magazine, in which he discusses the possibility of a bird flu pandemic, he states:

“They think that if a virus mutates, it’s an evolutionary event. Well, the virus is mutating because that is what viruses and other pathogens do. But evolution is not just random mutation. It is random mutation coupled with natural selection; it is a battle for competitive advantage among different strains generated by random mutation.

For bird flu to evolve into a human pandemic, the strain that finds a home in humanity has to be a strain that is both highly virulent and highly transmissible. Deadliness has to translate somehow into popularity; H5N1 has to find a way to kill or immobilize its human hosts, and still find other hosts to infect. Usually that doesn’t happen.”

Ewald goes on to explain that evolution in general is all about trade-offs, and in the evolution of infections the trade-off is between virulence and transmissibility.

What this means is that in order for a “bird flu” or “swine flu” to turn into a human pandemic, it has to find an environment that favors both deadly virulence and ease of transmission.

People living in squalor on the Western Front at the end of World War I generated such an environment, from which the epidemic of 1918 could arise.

Likewise, crowded chicken farms, slaughterhouses, and jam-packed markets of eastern Asia provide another such environment, and that environment gave rise to the bird flu — a pathogen that both kills and spreads, in birds, but not in humans.

Says Ewald:

“We know that H5N1 is well adapted to birds. We also know that it has a hard time becoming a virus that can move from person to person. It has a hard time without our doing anything. But we can make it harder. We can make sure it has no human population in which to evolve transmissibility. There is no need to rely on the mass extermination of chickens. There is no need to stockpile vaccines for everyone.

By vaccinating just the people most at risk — the people who work with chickens and the caregivers — we can prevent it from becoming transmissible among humans. Then it doesn’t matter what it does in chickens.”

Please remember that, despite the fantastic headlines and projections of MILLIONS of deaths, the H5N1 bird flu virus killed a mere 257 people worldwide since late 2003. As unfortunate as those deaths are, 257 deaths worldwide from any disease, over the course of five years, simply does not constitute an emergency worthy of much attention, let alone fear!

Honestly, your risk of being killed by a lightning strike in the last five years was about 2,300 percent higher than your risk of contracting and dying from the bird flu.6 I’m not kidding! In just one year (2004), more than 1,170 people died from lighting strikes, worldwide.7

So please, as the numbers of confirmed swine flu cases are released, keep a level head and don’t let fear run away with your brains.

So is the Swine Flu Getting More or Less Dangerous?

On Sunday, April 26, The Independent reported that more than 1,000 people had contracted the swine flu virus in Mexico, 8 but by the afternoon that same day, Mexican President Calderon declared that more than two-thirds of the 1,300 thought to have contracted the disease had been given a clean bill of health and sent home.9

Additionally, the number of actual confirmed cases appears to be far lower than reported in many media outlets, leading me to believe that many reporters are interchanging the terms “suspected cases” and “confirmed cases.”

Interestingly Mexico is the ONLY country in the world where someone has actually died from this disease.Mexico has actually reported 152 fatalities in flu-like cases in recent days, seven of which have been confirmed as swine flu. Another 19 patients have been confirmed as having swine flu but surviving. About 2,000 people have been hospitalized with symptoms.

By contrast, the United States has had 64 confirmed cases, five hospitalizations and no deaths

According to the World Health Organization’s Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response site; as of April 27, there are:

  • 64 laboratory confirmed cases in U.S. — 0 deaths (reported by CDC as of April 29)
  • 26 confirmed cases in Mexico — 7 deaths
  • 6 confirmed cases in Canada — 0 deaths
  • 1 confirmed case in Spain — 0 deaths

Additionally, nearly all suspected new cases have been reported as mild.

Personally, I am highly skeptical. It simply doesn’t add up to a real pandemic.

But it does raise serious questions about where this brand new, never before seen virus came from, especially since it cannot be contracted from eating pork products, and has never before been seen in pigs, and contain traits from the bird flu — and which, so far, only seems to respond to Tamiflu. Are we just that lucky, or… what?

Your Fear Will Make Some People VERY Rich in Today’s Crumbling Economy

swine flu According to the Associated Press at least one financial analyst estimates up to $388 million worth of Tamiflu sales in the near future10 — and that’s without a pandemic outbreak.

More than half a dozen pharmaceutical companies, including Gilead Sciences Inc., Roche, GlaxoSmithKline and other companies with a stake in flu treatments and detection, have seen a rise in their shares in a matter of days, and will likely see revenue boosts if the swine flu outbreak continues to spread.

As soon as Homeland Security declared a health emergency, 25 percent — about 12 million doses — of Tamiflu and Relenza treatment courses were released from the nation’s stockpile. However, beware that the declaration also allows unapproved tests and drugs to be administered to children. Many health- and government officials are more than willing to take that chance with your life, and the life of your child. But are you?

Remember, Tamiflu went through some rough times not too long ago, as the dangers of this drug came to light when, in 2007, the FDA finally began investigating some 1,800 adverse event reports related to the drug. Common side effects of Tamiflu include:

  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Diarrhea
  • Headache
  • Dizziness
  • Fatigue
  • Cough

All in all, the very symptoms you’re trying to avoid.

More serious symptoms included convulsions, delirium or delusions, and 14 deaths in children and teens as a result of neuropsychiatric problems and brain infections (which led Japan to ban Tamiflu for children in 2007). And that’s for a drug that, when used as directed, only reduces the duration of influenza symptoms by 1 to 1 ½ days, according to the official data.

But making matters worse, some patients with influenza are at HIGHER risk for secondary bacterial infections when on Tamiflu. And secondary bacterial infections, as I mentioned earlier, was likely the REAL cause of the mass fatalities during the 1918 pandemic!

Where did This Mysterious New Animal-Human Flu Strain Come From?

Alongside the fear-mongering headlines, I’ve also seen increasing numbers of reports questioning the true nature of this virus. And rightfully so.

Could a mixed animal-human mutant like this occur naturally? And if not, who made it, and how was it released?

Not one to dabble too deep in conspiracy theories, I don’t have to strain very hard to find actual facts to support the notion that this may not be a natural mutation, and that those who stand to gain have the wherewithal to pull off such a stunt.

Just last month I reported on the story that the American pharmaceutical company Baxter was under investigation for distributing the deadly avian flu virus to 18 different countries as part of a seasonal flu vaccine shipment. Czech reporters were probing to see if it may have been part of a deliberate attempt to start a pandemic; as such a “mistake” would be virtually impossible under the security protocols of that virus.

The H5N1 virus on its own is not very airborne. However, when combined with seasonal flu viruses, which are more easily spread, the effect could be a potent, airborne, deadly biological weapon. If this batch of live bird flu and seasonal flu viruses had reached the public, it could have resulted in dire consequences.

There is a name for this mixing of viruses; it’s called “reassortment,” and it is one of two ways pandemic viruses are created in the lab. Some scientists say the most recent global outbreak — the 1977 Russian flu — was started by a virus created and leaked from a laboratory.

Another example of the less sterling integrity of Big Pharma is the case of Bayer, who sold millions of dollars worth of an injectable blood-clotting medicine to Asian, Latin American, and some European countries in the mid-1980s, even though they knew it was tainted with the AIDS virus.

So while it is morally unthinkable that a drug company would knowingly contaminate flu vaccines with a deadly flu virus such as the bird- or swine flu, it is certainly not impossible. It has already happened more than once.

But there seems to be no repercussions or hard feelings when industry oversteps the boundaries of morality and integrity and enters the arena of obscenity. Because, lo and behold, which company has been chosen to head up efforts, along with WHO, to produce a vaccine against the Mexican swine flu?

Baxter!11 Despite the fact that ink has barely dried on the investigative reports from their should-be-criminal “mistake” against humanity.

According to other sources,12 a top scientist for the United Nations, who has examined the outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus in Africa, as well as HIV/AIDS victims, has concluded that the current swine flu virus possesses certain transmission “vectors” that suggest the new strain has been genetically-manufactured as a military biological warfare weapon.

The UN expert believes that Ebola, HIV/AIDS, and the current A-H1N1 swine flu virus are biological warfare agents.

In addition, Army criminal investigators are looking into the possibility that disease samples are missing from biolabs at Fort Detrick — the same Army research lab from which the 2001 anthrax strain was released, according to a recent article in the Fredrick News Post.13 In February, the top biodefense lab halted all its research into Ebola, anthrax, plague, and other diseases known as “select agents,” after they discovered virus samples that weren’t listed in its inventory and might have been switched with something else.

Factory Farming Maybe Source of Swine Flu

Another theory as to the cause of Swine Flu might be factory farming. In the United States, pigs travel coast to coast. They can be bred in North Carolina, fattened in the corn belt of Iowa, and slaughtered in California.

While this may reduce short-term costs for the pork industry, the highly contagious nature of diseases like influenza (perhaps made further infectious by the stresses of transport) needs to be considered when calculating the true cost of long-distance live animal transport.

The majority of U.S. pig farms now confine more than 5,000 animals each. With a group of 5,000 animals, if a novel virus shows up it will have more opportunity to replicate and potentially spread than in a group of 100 pigs on a small farm.

With massive concentrations of farm animals within which to mutate, these new swine flu viruses in North America seem to be on an evolutionary fast track, jumping and reassorting between species at an unprecedented rate.

Should You Accept a Flu Vaccine — Just to be Safe?

As stated in the New York Times14 and elsewhere, flu experts have no idea whether the current seasonal flu vaccine would offer any protection whatsoever against this exotic mutant, and it will take months to create a new one.

But let me tell you, getting vaccinated now would not only offer no protection and potentially cause great harm, it would most likely be loaded with toxic mercury which is used as a preservative in most flu vaccines..

I’ve written extensively about the numerous dangers (and ineffectiveness) of flu vaccines, and why I do not recommend them to anyone. So no matter what you hear — even if it comes from your doctor — don’t get a regular flu shot. They rarely work against seasonal flu…and certainly can’t offer protection against a never-before- seen strain.

Currently, the antiviral drugs Tamiflu and Relenza are the only drugs that appear effective against the (human flu) H1N1 virus, and I strongly believe taking Tamiflu to protect yourself against this new virus could be a serious mistake — for all the reasons I already mentioned above.

But in addition to the dangerous side effects of Tamiflu, there is also growing evidence of resistance against the drug. In February, the pre-publication and preliminary findings journal called Nature Precedings published a paper on this concern, stating15:

The dramatic rise of oseltamivir [Tamiflu] resistance in the H1N1 serotype in the 2007/2008 season and the fixing of H274Y in the 2008/2009 season has raised concerns regarding individuals at risk for seasonal influenza, as well as development of similar resistance in the H5N1 serotype [bird flu].

Previously, oseltamivir resistance produced changes in H1N1 and H3N2 at multiple positions in treated patients. In contrast, the recently reported resistance involved patients who had not recently taken oseltamivir.

It’s one more reason not to bother with this potentially dangerous drug.

And, once a specific swine flu drug is created, you can be sure that it has not had the time to be tested in clinical trials to determine safety and effectiveness, which puts us right back where I started this article — with a potential repeat of the last dangerous swine flu vaccine, which destroyed the lives of hundreds of people.

Topping the whole mess off, of course, is the fact that if the new vaccine turns out to be a killer, the pharmaceutical companies responsible are immune from lawsuits — something I’ve also warned about before on numerous occasions.

Unfortunately, those prospects won’t stop the governments of the world from mandating the vaccine — a scenario I hope we can all avoid.

How to Protect Yourself Without Dangerous Drugs and Vaccinations

For now, my point is that there are always going to be threats of flu pandemics, real or created, and there will always be potentially toxic vaccines that are peddled as the solution. But you can break free of that whole drug-solution trap by following some natural health principles.

I have not caught a flu in over two decades, and you can avoid it too, without getting vaccinated, by following these simple guidelines, which will keep your immune system in optimal working order so that you’re far less likely to acquire the infection to begin with.

This is probably the single most important and least expensive action you can take. I would STRONGLY urge you to have your vitamin D level monitored to confirm your levels are therapeutic at 50-70 ng.ml and done by a reliable vitamin D lab like Lab Corp.

For those of you in the US we hope to launch a vitamin D testing service through Lab Corp that allows you to have your vitamin D levels checked inexpensively at your local blood drawing facility and relatively inexpensively. We hope to offer this service by June 2009.

If you are coming down with flu like symptoms and have not been on vitamin D you can take doses of 50,000 units a day for three days to treat the acute infection. Some researchers like Dr. Cannell, believe the dose could even be as high as 1000 units per pound of body weight for three days.

  • Avoid Sugar and Processed Foods. Sugar decreases the function of your immune system almost immediately, and as you likely know, a strong immune system is key to fighting off viruses and other illness. Be aware that sugar is present in foods you may not suspect, like ketchup and fruit juice.
  • Get Enough Rest. Just like it becomes harder for you to get your daily tasks done if you’re tired, if your body is overly fatigued it will be harder for it to fight the flu. Be sure to check out my article Guide to a Good Night’s Sleep for some great tips to help you get quality rest.
  • Have Effective Tools to Address Stress . We all face some stress every day, but if stress becomes overwhelming then your body will be less able to fight off the flu and other illness.

    If you feel that stress is taking a toll on your health, consider using an energy psychology tool such as the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT), which is remarkably effective in relieving stress associated with all kinds of events, from work to family to trauma. You can check out my free, 25-page EFT manual for some guidelines on how to perform EFT.

  • Exercise. When you exercise, you increase your circulation and your blood flow throughout your body. The components of your immune system are also better circulated, which means your immune system has a better chance of finding an illness before it spreads. You can review my exercise guidelines for some great tips on how to get started.
  • Take a good source of animal based omega-3 fats like Krill oil. Increase your intake of healthy and essential fats like the omega-3 found in krill oil, which is crucial for maintaining health. It is also vitally important to avoid damaged omega-6 oils that are trans fats and in processed foods as it will seriously damage your immune response.
  • Wash Your Hands. Washing your hands will decrease your likelihood of spreading a virus to your nose, mouth or other people. Be sure you don’t use antibacterial soap for this — antibacterial soaps are completely unnecessary, and they cause far more harm than good. Instead, identify a simple chemical-free soap that you can switch your family to.
  • Eat Garlic Regularly. Garlic works like a broad-spectrum antibiotic against bacteria, virus, and protozoa in the body. And unlike with antibiotics, no resistance can be built up so it is an absolutely safe product to use. However, if you are allergic or don’t enjoy garlic it would be best to avoid as it will likely cause more harm than good.
  • Avoid Hospitals and Vaccines In this particular case, I’d also recommend you stay away from hospitals unless you’re having an emergency, as hospitals are prime breeding grounds for infections of all kinds, and could be one of the likeliest places you could be exposed to this new bug.  Vaccines will not be available for six months at the minimum but when available they will be ineffective and can lead to crippling paralysis like Guillain-Barré Syndrome just as it did in the 70s.

a {text-decoration:none;} #caja {;display: none; padding:5px; margin-top:10px; border:1px solid #FADDA9; background-color:#FDF4E1;} #mostrar{display:block; padding:5px;border:1px solid #D0E8F4; background-color:#ECF8FD;}


Related Blogs